Uber blows through its IT budget for AI for 2026 and it's only April citing rising costs of Claude Code
Uber exhausts 2026 AI budget by April due to rising Claude Code inference costs.
Search the full wire by company, model, lab, or keyword. Every story we have ever aggregated.
Uber exhausts 2026 AI budget by April due to rising Claude Code inference costs.
User argues for $40–$60 mid-tier Claude subscription option between $20 Pro and $100 Max plans to address pricing gap.
COBALT formal verification tool targets arithmetic vulnerabilities (CWE-190/191/195) in AI sandbox infrastructure post-April 2026 Claude Mythos escape.
Anthropic's Mythos AI model, a powerful cybersecurity tool that the company said could be dangerous in the wrong hands, has been accessed by a "small group of unauthorized users," Bloomberg reports. An unnamed member of the group, identified only as "a third-party contractor for Anthropic," told the publication that members of a private online forum got into Mythos via a mix of tactics, utilizing the contractor's access and "commonly used internet sleuthing tools." The Claude Mythos Preview is a new general-purpose model that's capable of identifying and exploiting vulnerabilities "in every m...
Mozilla used Claude Mythos Preview to identify 271 vulnerabilities in Firefox 150, demonstrating practical AI security tooling in production browsers.
GitHub Copilot tightens Individual plan limits, pauses signups, restricts Claude Opus 4.7 to $39/month Pro+ tier citing agentic workflow compute demands.
Autistic user testimonial about using Claude Co-work for organizing 20 years of personal creative systems and documents.
Anthropic briefly moved Claude Code from $20 Pro to $100+ Max tier, then reverted; pricing confusion around feature tiers.
Was looking at buying the $20 Plan today after a demonstration from a friend (and wanting to switch/try my options from Codex), but saw that Claude Code was not included. I wanted to ask if this was a temporary change, or if the Pro plan truly never had Claude Code, and I was mistaken. My friend has a Max plan, so I could just be mistaken. Thanks! Edit: Link to site: [https://claude.com/pricing](https://claude.com/pricing)
https://github.com/BrainBlend-AI/tesseron Just open-sourced a protocol and TypeScript SDK I built mostly *with* Claude Code. The goal: let *Claude* (or any MCP client) drive a live application (browser tab, *Electron* / *Tauri* desktop app, Node daemon, CLI) by calling typed handlers inside your code, instead of scraping the UI with *Playwright* or *Computer Use*. It's called **Tesseron**. Ships as a Claude Code plugin, so install is one command: ``` /plugin marketplace add BrainBlend-AI/tesseron /plugin install tesseron@tesseron ``` Plugin spawns a small local MCP gateway automatically. ...
User reports Claude Code feature removed from Anthropic Pro plan pricing page.
Claude Code removed from Claude Pro plan feature list; support docs updated to mention Max plan only.
Anecdotal observation about Claude's conversational patterns resembling fictional character Mr. Meeseeks.
I am running into a pretty serious reasoning issue with Claude Opus 4.7. In my case, the problem is not just that it made a mistake or misunderstood a complex codebase. It seems unable to maintain a logical thread even across a few sentences. I was discussing a communication protocol and a very specific issue involving the encapsulation of 2 packets. This was not an especially obscure topic, just a technical discussion where consistency across consecutive messages really matters. But it keeps losing the thread almost immediately. It will accept premise A, then a couple of sentences later r...
I’ve been building plugins for Claude Code, and the first version of the idea was very Claude-focused. That made sense at the start. Claude Code has a real plugin model, hooks are useful, and it is one of the few agent tools where plugins can actually become part of a daily workflow. But after building a few integrations, I kept running into the same uncomfortable question: If I write the useful part of a plugin once, why should I rewrite or repackage the same thing again for Codex, Gemini, Cursor, OpenCode, and whatever comes next? The actual plugin logic is often not Claude-specific. Th...
User reports Claude autonomously detected and investigated cryptominer in Docker container via code review.
**TL;DR**: Bought Claude Max 5x Gift on April 9, 2026. Worked fine for 12 days, then silently downgraded to Free plan with zero notification. Billing still shows “Paid $0.00” and valid until May 9. This is a widespread known bug. The real problem is support: \- [https://support.anthropic.com](https://support.anthropic.com) has no **ticket form**, no way to submit a real request for regular users. \- The only way to contact support is through the in-app “Get Help” chat on [claude.ai](http://claude.ai) — which is just useless Fin AI Agent. \- Once your account is downgraded to Free, h...
Anthropic secures 5 gigawatts of Amazon’s custom silicon as Claude demand soars.
Comparative study of output consistency across GPT-4.1, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Gemini 2.5 Flash for exercise prescriptions with safety analysis.
User reports Claude Opus 4.7 performs worse than 4.6 on file search and factual accuracy tasks.
Claude Code UX improvement: double-paste expands truncated pasted content, fixing long-standing issue.
Reddit speculation that Claude 4.7 performance degradation stems from cost optimization and OpenClaw re-enablement; unverified claim.
User praises Claude Design's typography and font selection quality in graphic design task execution.
Critique that agent/agentic tools like OpenClaw reduce utility for experienced developers despite onboarding novices.
Claude Auto mode in Code allows tool execution without per-call approval but lacks safety guardrails, enabling dangerous Bash commands.
Contradictory user reports on Claude Opus 4.7: some praise instruction adherence and comprehension; others cite regression in context and creativity.
Multi-turn dialogue study reveals LLMs exhibit divergent repair behaviors: some resist user corrections, others highly susceptible to manipulation.
Humorous user anecdote about Claude model context limits.
Satirical critique of Claude Design output: consistent teal gradients and serif fonts regardless of user requirements.