Search the full wire by company, model, lab, or keyword. Every story we have ever aggregated.
Was looking at buying the $20 Plan today after a demonstration from a friend (and wanting to switch/try my options from Codex), but saw that Claude Code was not included. I wanted to ask if this was a temporary change, or if the Pro plan truly never had Claude Code, and I was mistaken. My friend has a Max plan, so I could just be mistaken. Thanks! Edit: Link to site: [https://claude.com/pricing](https://claude.com/pricing)
https://github.com/BrainBlend-AI/tesseron Just open-sourced a protocol and TypeScript SDK I built mostly *with* Claude Code. The goal: let *Claude* (or any MCP client) drive a live application (browser tab, *Electron* / *Tauri* desktop app, Node daemon, CLI) by calling typed handlers inside your code, instead of scraping the UI with *Playwright* or *Computer Use*. It's called **Tesseron**. Ships as a Claude Code plugin, so install is one command: ``` /plugin marketplace add BrainBlend-AI/tesseron /plugin install tesseron@tesseron ``` Plugin spawns a small local MCP gateway automatically. ...
User reports Claude Code feature removed from Anthropic Pro plan pricing page.
Claude Code removed from Claude Pro plan feature list; support docs updated to mention Max plan only.
Anecdotal observation about Claude's conversational patterns resembling fictional character Mr. Meeseeks.
I am running into a pretty serious reasoning issue with Claude Opus 4.7. In my case, the problem is not just that it made a mistake or misunderstood a complex codebase. It seems unable to maintain a logical thread even across a few sentences. I was discussing a communication protocol and a very specific issue involving the encapsulation of 2 packets. This was not an especially obscure topic, just a technical discussion where consistency across consecutive messages really matters. But it keeps losing the thread almost immediately. It will accept premise A, then a couple of sentences later r...
I’ve been building plugins for Claude Code, and the first version of the idea was very Claude-focused. That made sense at the start. Claude Code has a real plugin model, hooks are useful, and it is one of the few agent tools where plugins can actually become part of a daily workflow. But after building a few integrations, I kept running into the same uncomfortable question: If I write the useful part of a plugin once, why should I rewrite or repackage the same thing again for Codex, Gemini, Cursor, OpenCode, and whatever comes next? The actual plugin logic is often not Claude-specific. Th...
User reports Claude autonomously detected and investigated cryptominer in Docker container via code review.
**TL;DR**: Bought Claude Max 5x Gift on April 9, 2026. Worked fine for 12 days, then silently downgraded to Free plan with zero notification. Billing still shows “Paid $0.00” and valid until May 9. This is a widespread known bug. The real problem is support: \- [https://support.anthropic.com](https://support.anthropic.com) has no **ticket form**, no way to submit a real request for regular users. \- The only way to contact support is through the in-app “Get Help” chat on [claude.ai](http://claude.ai) — which is just useless Fin AI Agent. \- Once your account is downgraded to Free, h...
Anthropic secures 5 gigawatts of Amazon’s custom silicon as Claude demand soars.
Comparative study of output consistency across GPT-4.1, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Gemini 2.5 Flash for exercise prescriptions with safety analysis.
User reports Claude Opus 4.7 performs worse than 4.6 on file search and factual accuracy tasks.
Claude Code UX improvement: double-paste expands truncated pasted content, fixing long-standing issue.
Reddit speculation that Claude 4.7 performance degradation stems from cost optimization and OpenClaw re-enablement; unverified claim.
User praises Claude Design's typography and font selection quality in graphic design task execution.
Critique that agent/agentic tools like OpenClaw reduce utility for experienced developers despite onboarding novices.
Claude Auto mode in Code allows tool execution without per-call approval but lacks safety guardrails, enabling dangerous Bash commands.
Contradictory user reports on Claude Opus 4.7: some praise instruction adherence and comprehension; others cite regression in context and creativity.
Multi-turn dialogue study reveals LLMs exhibit divergent repair behaviors: some resist user corrections, others highly susceptible to manipulation.
Humorous user anecdote about Claude model context limits.
Satirical critique of Claude Design output: consistent teal gradients and serif fonts regardless of user requirements.
Claude Desktop silently registers browser automation hooks in Chromium browsers without user consent; Claude itself flagged the privacy issue.
User reports Claude Opus 4.7 exhibits context degradation, uncontrolled generation, and reduced instruction adherence vs. 4.6.
Senior engineer reports no skill degradation after 4+ months of LLM-assisted coding with Claude Opus 4.1-4.5.
Developer switching from Claude Opus 4.7 to Kimi K2.6 citing performance degradation and cost, supplementing with Qwen 3.6.
User reports unsolicited GitHub access request from Claude; raises security concern about autonomous tool use.
User speculates that Claude Sonnet 4.7 will fix Opus model errors.
Moonshot releases Kimi K2.6, an open-weight model claiming performance parity with Claude Opus 4.6.